[MD] BioCentrism: Was Zeno correct?

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

BtW, it comes from the theory of everything, wich is clearly rejected by
Hawking.

2010/11/5 ADRIE KINTZIGER <parser666 at gmail.com>

> drivel.
> tell this to the people living aroud Pripyat, Tcherbobyl,...just observe
> your environment intensively, and there is no radiation.
> Tell this to the Jap's in Hiroshima,...
>
> Why do the Russians an Mercans bother to build nuke's, if the enemy is
> capable of ingoring them, so they will not explode?
> Adrie
>
> 2010/11/5 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>
>
>>
>>
>> An experiment published in 1990 suggests that Zeno was right. In this
>> experiment, scientists demonstrated the quantum equivalent of the adage that
>> "a watched pot doesn't boil." This behavior, the "quantum Zeno effect,"
>> turns out to be a function of observation. "It seems,"said physicist Peter
>> Coveney, "that the act of looking at an atom prevents it from changing".
>> Theoretically, if a nuclear bomb were watched intently enough -- that is, if
>> you could check its atoms every million trillionth of a second -- it
>> wouldn't explode. Bizarre? The problem lies not in the experiments but in
>> our way of thinking about time. Biocentrism is the only comprehensible way
>> to explain these results, which are only "weird" in the context of the
>> existing paradigm.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-lanza/is-death-the-end-new-expe_b_774814.html?view=print
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> parser
>



-- 
parser