[MD] BioCentrism: Was Zeno correct?

[MarshaV]

So in the beginning was the word of Hawking?   


On Nov 5, 2010, at 6:28 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:

> BtW, it comes from the theory of everything, wich is clearly rejected by
> Hawking.
> 
> 2010/11/5 ADRIE KINTZIGER <parser666 at gmail.com>
> 
>> drivel.
>> tell this to the people living aroud Pripyat, Tcherbobyl,...just observe
>> your environment intensively, and there is no radiation.
>> Tell this to the Jap's in Hiroshima,...
>> 
>> Why do the Russians an Mercans bother to build nuke's, if the enemy is
>> capable of ingoring them, so they will not explode?
>> Adrie
>> 
>> 2010/11/5 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> An experiment published in 1990 suggests that Zeno was right. In this
>>> experiment, scientists demonstrated the quantum equivalent of the adage that
>>> "a watched pot doesn't boil." This behavior, the "quantum Zeno effect,"
>>> turns out to be a function of observation. "It seems,"said physicist Peter
>>> Coveney, "that the act of looking at an atom prevents it from changing".
>>> Theoretically, if a nuclear bomb were watched intently enough -- that is, if
>>> you could check its atoms every million trillionth of a second -- it
>>> wouldn't explode. Bizarre? The problem lies not in the experiments but in
>>> our way of thinking about time. Biocentrism is the only comprehensible way
>>> to explain these results, which are only "weird" in the context of the
>>> existing paradigm.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-lanza/is-death-the-end-new-expe_b_774814.html?view=print
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> parser
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> parser


 
___