[MD] BioCentrism: Was Zeno correct?
118
ununoctiums at gmail.com
Fri Nov 5 08:13:18 PDT 2010
Hi Marsha,
I am not much of a Huffington reader. But this does seem to bring up the
paradoxes coming from quantum mechanics. Because they are paradoxes, they
are interesting, but may just point to the circular referencing of knowledge
and the pitfalls one can run into using logic. Physics is not different in
this respect. At such times, one can simply revert back to the intuitive
and dispel what logic or math tell us. Such quandaries also result from
quantum vector collapse. Logical statements may be misleading and perhaps
aberrations of the method of analysis or description. As such, the
intellectual level has its own faults. It is interesting to consider why
they arise, what is the root of such paradoxes? Whether it be Zeno or
Coveney, both are descriptions created by the human mind. Where is the
defect?
Cheers,
Mark
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:21 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> An experiment published in 1990 suggests that Zeno was right. In this
> experiment, scientists demonstrated the quantum equivalent of the adage that
> "a watched pot doesn't boil." This behavior, the "quantum Zeno effect,"
> turns out to be a function of observation. "It seems,"said physicist Peter
> Coveney, "that the act of looking at an atom prevents it from changing".
> Theoretically, if a nuclear bomb were watched intently enough -- that is, if
> you could check its atoms every million trillionth of a second -- it
> wouldn't explode. Bizarre? The problem lies not in the experiments but in
> our way of thinking about time. Biocentrism is the only comprehensible way
> to explain these results, which are only "weird" in the context of the
> existing paradigm.
>
>
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-lanza/is-death-the-end-new-expe_b_774814.html?view=print
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list