[MD] BioCentrism: Was Zeno correct?

[MarshaV]

Hi Mark,

I believe the root of the paradoxes is thinking reality is made up of a self 
and independent, external objects.  The 'self' is a particularly thorny problem,
and one very difficult to overcome.  For me, it is the detaching from the SOM 
illusion that is the key.  imho

Marsha




On Nov 5, 2010, at 11:13 AM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> I am not much of a Huffington reader.  But this does seem to bring up the
> paradoxes coming from quantum mechanics.  Because they are paradoxes, they
> are interesting, but may just point to the circular referencing of knowledge
> and the pitfalls one can run into using logic.  Physics is not different in
> this respect.  At such times, one can simply revert back to the intuitive
> and dispel what logic or math tell us.  Such quandaries also result from
> quantum vector collapse.  Logical statements may be misleading and perhaps
> aberrations of the method of analysis or description.  As such, the
> intellectual level has its own faults.  It is interesting to consider why
> they arise, what is the root of such paradoxes?  Whether it be Zeno or
> Coveney, both are descriptions created by the human mind.  Where is the
> defect?
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark
> 
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:21 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> An experiment published in 1990 suggests that Zeno was right. In this
>> experiment, scientists demonstrated the quantum equivalent of the adage that
>> "a watched pot doesn't boil." This behavior, the "quantum Zeno effect,"
>> turns out to be a function of observation. "It seems,"said physicist Peter
>> Coveney, "that the act of looking at an atom prevents it from changing".
>> Theoretically, if a nuclear bomb were watched intently enough -- that is, if
>> you could check its atoms every million trillionth of a second -- it
>> wouldn't explode. Bizarre? The problem lies not in the experiments but in
>> our way of thinking about time. Biocentrism is the only comprehensible way
>> to explain these results, which are only "weird" in the context of the
>> existing paradigm.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-lanza/is-death-the-end-new-expe_b_774814.html?view=print
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___