[MD] BioCentrism: Was Zeno correct?

[118]

Hi Craig,
I agree, although there are other interpretations of quantum collapse right
in the moment, and thus creation through the arising of one from an infinite
number of probabilities by observation itself.  Concern:  These ideas only
true according to theories in quantum mechanics.  We must not make it more
than that since such theories have their limitations.  They should not be
projected without an understanding of the premises which create them.  A
good example of such reckless projection can be seen in the use of the
theory of evolution.  The ubiquitous use of (sometimes unrelated) scientific
theory for everything is one of the flaws of Scientism.  I believe Marsha is
guilty of this promotional effort, from the subject's title.  Use it when
it's useful, deny it when it's not.  Sometimes lacks credibility.

(Love you Marsha)
Mark

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:09 PM, <craigerb at comcast.net> wrote:

> "Observation" is ambiguous.  If light or other detectable energy is
> created in a physical process, then it existed before it was observed.
> But if light or something else is introduced in order to observe,
> then it changes the process.
> Craig
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>