[MD] BioCentrism: Was Zeno correct?

[MarshaV]

Mark,

I offered the article because John Carl is fond of the Robert's Lanza's 
BioCentrism and I think also Ham has mentioned him.  

Love you too.


Marsha  



On Nov 5, 2010, at 4:42 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Craig,
> I agree, although there are other interpretations of quantum collapse right
> in the moment, and thus creation through the arising of one from an infinite
> number of probabilities by observation itself.  Concern:  These ideas only
> true according to theories in quantum mechanics.  We must not make it more
> than that since such theories have their limitations.  They should not be
> projected without an understanding of the premises which create them.  A
> good example of such reckless projection can be seen in the use of the
> theory of evolution.  The ubiquitous use of (sometimes unrelated) scientific
> theory for everything is one of the flaws of Scientism.  I believe Marsha is
> guilty of this promotional effort, from the subject's title.  Use it when
> it's useful, deny it when it's not.  Sometimes lacks credibility.
> 
> (Love you Marsha)
> Mark
> 
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:09 PM, <craigerb at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> "Observation" is ambiguous.  If light or other detectable energy is
>> created in a physical process, then it existed before it was observed.
>> But if light or something else is introduced in order to observe,
>> then it changes the process.
>> Craig
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___