[MD] BioCentrism: Was Zeno correct?

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

Hi, Marsha, it means only this, importing Zeno in the moq is not a good
idea.
better that it is told to you before it fires in your hands.

Nobody owns the truth.
we cannot have reality blurred with occultism.
dont get me wrong , i like mysticism, occultism, but do not make a widget
out of it.
Okay?

2010/11/7 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>

>
> Adrie,
>
> Although I think that quantum physics represents the West's most
> dynamic, cutting-edge science, what I find most interesting are the
> enigmas, paradoxes and anomalies because they most likely are
> the weak spots that may shatter the deep-seated belief in scientific
> materialism.  Einstein and Hawking have offered ever-changing,
> relational, impermanent intellectual static patterns of value, not the
> Absolute Truth.   Space-time and wormholes are conceptually
> constructed patterns overlaid onto a flow of Dynamic Quality.  So
> citing Anthony citing Einstein and Hawking to bolster your opinion
> that the BioCentrism article was wrong, means what?
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser