[MD] BioCentrism: Was Zeno correct?

[MarshaV]

On Nov 7, 2010, at 7:08 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:

> Hi, Marsha, it means only this, importing Zeno in the moq is not a good
> idea.
> better that it is told to you before it fires in your hands.

Please explain why?   


> 
> Nobody owns the truth.
> we cannot have reality blurred with occultism.
> dont get me wrong , i like mysticism, occultism, but do not make a widget
> out of it.
> Okay?





> 
> 2010/11/7 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
> 
>> 
>> Adrie,
>> 
>> Although I think that quantum physics represents the West's most
>> dynamic, cutting-edge science, what I find most interesting are the
>> enigmas, paradoxes and anomalies because they most likely are
>> the weak spots that may shatter the deep-seated belief in scientific
>> materialism.  Einstein and Hawking have offered ever-changing,
>> relational, impermanent intellectual static patterns of value, not the
>> Absolute Truth.   Space-time and wormholes are conceptually
>> constructed patterns overlaid onto a flow of Dynamic Quality.  So
>> citing Anthony citing Einstein and Hawking to bolster your opinion
>> that the BioCentrism article was wrong, means what?
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___