[MD] Betternes - 4 levels of!

[david buchanan]

It's funny how all the evidence and reason goes missing from your response, especially since you tend to duplicate everything whether it's relevant or not. It's funny how this laziness evaporates when there's reason and evidence worth deleting.
Thanks for proving my point.

 

> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:25:47 -0800
> From: ununoctiums at gmail.com
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] Betternes - 4 levels of!
> 
> Hey Marsha,
> I hear you.  I thought we had gotten over this whole concept of what is more
> True.  I thought that was in ZMM.  Perhaps my interpretation is different
> than some others.  While I may be an egoist, I stand corrected all the time.
>  So, at least you are not talking about me.
> 
> Who's got that flag with the Big Q on it?  Why is he running around
> erratically pushing people out of his way?  Where is he off to, seems like
> circles to me?  Saw that on a farm once, when we went out to get something
> for dinner from the chicken coop.  Tasted pretty good cooked though.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:23 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
> >
> > dmb,
> >
> > I am convinced in the same way that egotists are incorrigible for
> > psychological reasons and they cannot or will not be corrected by evidence
> > or reason.  When, for instance,  they deny that truth within the MoQ is
> > relative while the MoQ Textbook clearly states "the MOQ follows a pragmatic
> > notion of truth so truth is seen as relative in his system while Quality is
> > seen as absolute."
> >
> >
> > Marsha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:34 PM, david buchanan wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > dmb says:
> > >
> > > I'm convinced that theists are incorrigible for psychological reasons and
> > they cannot or will not be corrected by evidence or reason. And if that's
> > where you're at, so to speak, your place is in a church and you shouldn't be
> > surprised when your theism is not well received in a philosophy discussion.
> > Considering the atheistic and even anti-theistic stance of the MOQ's author,
> > you'd have to be a bit nuts to think that kind of thing would fly in this
> > context. Waving the theism flag around here is way beyond mere confusion, my
> > friend.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html