[MD] Betternes - 4 levels of!

[118]

Hey Marsha,
I hear you.  I thought we had gotten over this whole concept of what is more
True.  I thought that was in ZMM.  Perhaps my interpretation is different
than some others.  While I may be an egoist, I stand corrected all the time.
 So, at least you are not talking about me.

Who's got that flag with the Big Q on it?  Why is he running around
erratically pushing people out of his way?  Where is he off to, seems like
circles to me?  Saw that on a farm once, when we went out to get something
for dinner from the chicken coop.  Tasted pretty good cooked though.

Mark

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:23 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
> dmb,
>
> I am convinced in the same way that egotists are incorrigible for
> psychological reasons and they cannot or will not be corrected by evidence
> or reason.  When, for instance,  they deny that truth within the MoQ is
> relative while the MoQ Textbook clearly states "the MOQ follows a pragmatic
> notion of truth so truth is seen as relative in his system while Quality is
> seen as absolute."
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:34 PM, david buchanan wrote:
>
> >
> > dmb says:
> >
> > I'm convinced that theists are incorrigible for psychological reasons and
> they cannot or will not be corrected by evidence or reason. And if that's
> where you're at, so to speak, your place is in a church and you shouldn't be
> surprised when your theism is not well received in a philosophy discussion.
> Considering the atheistic and even anti-theistic stance of the MOQ's author,
> you'd have to be a bit nuts to think that kind of thing would fly in this
> context. Waving the theism flag around here is way beyond mere confusion, my
> friend.
> >
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>