[MD] [Bulk] Re: a nursery rhyme

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

>Mark.
> I would suggest that physics is a subset of metaphysics.  Physics Gurus
may
> have us believe it is the other way around.  They say, "This is it, now
you
> must work within it, you have no choice".  I believe that Marsha would
look
> askance at such a statement.  As a subset of metaphysics, it is one of
many
> possible descriptions of reality.  It has value for some, not for others.
------------------

Its impossible to have a metaphysiks, without the presence of a physikal
environment first, inorganic,organic, biological, intellectual(meta)

because you seem to like analogy's , Mark, it is impossible to produce a
metaphysikal turd.
You can only produce a physikal one....,and produce a philosophy about turds
on the interlechual level, enhancing it to a metaphysikal branch if you
like.


But metaphysikal turds

Btw , why am i telling you this, you'r an expert in producing metaphysikal
turds!


2010/11/10 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com>

> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > The clock struck one and I just got done (reading these posts I mean).
> >
> > I would suggest that physics is a subset of metaphysics.  Physics Gurus
> may
> > have us believe it is the other way around.  They say, "This is it, now
> you
> > must work within it, you have no choice".  I believe that Marsha would
> look
> > askance at such a statement.  As a subset of metaphysics, it is one of
> many
> > possible descriptions of reality.  It has value for some, not for others.
> >
> > "But", says Hawkings, "how can you not agree, where did I make a mistake?
> >  This has all been peer reviewed!"
> >
> > Well I state patiently, Your mistake was mistaking the equation for
> > reality.  Such an approach is one of many metaphysical interpretations of
> > one's appreciation for reality.  It is a great description created by the
> > brain, but not necessarily the best.
> >
> > "But, I have proof" says Hawking "look at all these data that now support
> > the theory!".
> >
> > Well such data are data.  How it is manipulated depends on the premises
> of
> > your equation.  What about that point right there (showing some point
> > outside the circle of reality)?
> >
> > "Well", says Hawking, "that is an outlier, it was a result of the
> measuring
> > process, you know, quantum mechanics and such, besides, it if that is a
> > problem, I can soon fix it by expanding the equation.  How many
> dimensions
> > do you want? I have already put in 13, is that not enough for you?"
> >
> > OK, Hawking, carry on, let me know when you are done.
> >
> > Hawking (flustered) "But that could take millions of years, we have just
> > started.  I promise you that it is all good, you just have to be
> patient."
> >
> > OK, like I said, carry on.  Gotta go and grab a ham sandwich, but I'll be
> > back to be impressed.
> >
> > Hawking, "You just don't understand, nobody seems to understand"
> >
> > I hear you Hawking.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >> parser
> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> Archives:
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >>
> >
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser