[MD] BioCentrism: Was Goldilocks right?

[MarshaV]

And?   


On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:00 PM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:

> The past exists only in our memories, the future only in our plans. The
> present is our only reality. The tree that you are aware of intellectually,
> because of that small time lag, is always in the past and therefore is
> always unreal. Any intellectually conceived object is always in the past and
> therefore unreal. Reality is always the moment of vision before the
> intellectualization takes place. There is no other reality. This
> preintellectual reality is what Phædrus felt he had properly identified as
> Quality. Since all intellectually identifiable
> things must emerge from this preintellectual reality, Quality is the parent,
> the source of all subjects and objects.
> 
> 
> Zam, about around 1974
> 
> 
> 
> 
> MarshaV aan MoQ
> details weergeven 16:13 (1 uur geleden)
> 
> 
> "Theoretical physicists Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow recently
> stated:
> 
> "There is no way to remove the observer -- us -- from our perceptions of the
> world ... In classical physics, the past is assumed to exist as a definite
> series of events, but according to quantum physics, the past, like the
> future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities."
> 
> "If we, the observer, collapse these possibilities (that is, the past and
> future) then where does that leave evolutionary theory, as described in our
> schoolbooks? Until the present is determined, how can there be a past? The
> past begins with the observer, us, not the other way around as we've been
> taught."
> 
> 
> 2010, grand design.
> 
> 
> (Adrie)
> The biggest promotor of this was John Archibald Wheeler
> once it was recognised, it became impossible to get around it.
> It exists in many forms now,...a variant is embedded in the many-worlds
> interpretation(Hawking) originating; ,"William James."
> 
> 
> 
> 2010/11/12 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
> 
>> 
>> "Theoretical physicists Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow recently
>> stated:
>> 
>> "There is no way to remove the observer -- us -- from our perceptions of
>> the world ... In classical physics, the past is assumed to exist as a
>> definite series of events, but according to quantum physics, the past, like
>> the future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities."
>> 
>> "If we, the observer, collapse these possibilities (that is, the past and
>> future) then where does that leave evolutionary theory, as described in our
>> schoolbooks? Until the present is determined, how can there be a past? The
>> past begins with the observer, us, not the other way around as we've been
>> taught."
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-lanza/why-are-you-here-new-theo_b_781055.html?view=print
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___