[MD] Is this the inadequacy of the MOQ?

[118]

>
> Hey JC,
>


> John:
>
> Leonard Shlain's Art and Physics, is an excellent example of the kind of
> thinking you describe, and what I think it means is, that there's a lot of
> experience that we absorb that we don't really aknowledge or understand.
> That our environment, intellectual and social and inorganic, influence us
> along lines that we can't intellectualize until we realize.  That these
> realizations come into awareness through our appreciation of a certain
> quality that we can't deny, but can't define.  And first and foremost, they
> are realized through a certain aesthetic sense - that "feels good", and
> thus
> we pursue them in artistic endeavor while refining them in intellectual
> endeavor.
>
> That's what I think it means.
>


> [Mark]

And if we call that thing Quality, then we have another brick in the wall.
 I agree with your agreement of my agreeing with your meaning of my meaning,
in advance.

Best,
Ununoctium 118, a nobel gas, or maybe not, perhaps its one of them damn
platypuses.

>


>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>