[MD] Is this the inadequacy of the MOQ?

[rapsncows at fastmail.fm]

John,
thanks,
Tim


>[John] Tim, don't listen to Andre.  He's furiously misconstruing the historical
> facts of the matter in order to further an agenda.

[Tim]
I wonder what agenda.  Seems you know.
 

> John:
> 
> This is absolutely correct.  Every moment of your normal "now", is
> informed
> by ideas gathered from your past,  with which you choose and create your
> choices for the future.  If you could somehow make this present moment of
> experience "pure", then it'd end up being nothing at all.
> 

[Tim]
I just watched this movie on tv, 'bulletproof monk', at one point he
said, 'water that is too pure has no fish.'

> John:
> 
> If you have no idea, Andre, then maybe you should listen (read) instead
> of
> talking (writing)  about what you don't know.  Royce and James were both
> skeptical of Hegel, and even Pirsig was enthusiastic in the end, of the
> one
> Absolute Idealist that he encountered in the Copleston Annotations - FH
> Bradly.

[Tim]
I will take a look into this Bradley fellow, thanks.

thanks for the support,
Tim
 
-- 
  
  rapsncows at fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.