[MD] The MOQ difference

[David Thomas]

On 10/4/10 3:13 PM, "David Buchanan" <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:

> dmb says:
> 
> Ever-changing static patterns?  You might see Quality from an
> unpatterned/patterned point of view?
> 
> Isn't it true that static means stable, which is approximately the opposite of
> ever-changing?
> 
> Isn't it true that the MOQ's first conceptual distinction is between dynamic
> (unpatterned) and static (patterned)?
> 
> So the phrase "ever-changing static patterns" undermines the MOQ first
> distinction. Like the phrases "fluid rigidity" or "stable flux", it's
> nonsense. Just ask Susanna. She knows it rained all night the day I left, the
> weather it was dry. The sun was so hot I nearly froze to death, Susanna don't
> you cry. 

As Marsha might respond:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbfbVMpzgx4&feature=related

What about clouds?

And life?

Dave