[MD] The MOQ difference

[david buchanan]

Really? Judy Collins on YouTube? 

Don't know why, but she always sounded like nails on a chalkboard to me. Makes me cringe just to think of it.

I just can't watch the video. Sorry. If you had an actual point to make, you'll have to do some typing. 



> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:39:29 -0500
> From: combinedefforts at earthlink.net
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] The MOQ difference
> 
> On 10/4/10 3:13 PM, "David Buchanan" <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > dmb says:
> > 
> > Ever-changing static patterns?  You might see Quality from an
> > unpatterned/patterned point of view?
> > 
> > Isn't it true that static means stable, which is approximately the opposite of
> > ever-changing?
> > 
> > Isn't it true that the MOQ's first conceptual distinction is between dynamic
> > (unpatterned) and static (patterned)?
> > 
> > So the phrase "ever-changing static patterns" undermines the MOQ first
> > distinction. Like the phrases "fluid rigidity" or "stable flux", it's
> > nonsense. Just ask Susanna. She knows it rained all night the day I left, the
> > weather it was dry. The sun was so hot I nearly froze to death, Susanna don't
> > you cry. 
> 
> As Marsha might respond:
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbfbVMpzgx4&feature=related
> 
> What about clouds?
> 
> And life?
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html