[MD] Emptiness & Quantum Mechancics
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Fri Oct 8 23:02:52 PDT 2010
Hi Mark,
From the Buddhist side, things exist interdependently. For example, all things
depend upon being designated or imputed by consciousness. From a MoQ
point-of-view, this is why I am so interested in the nature of patterns, all patterns.
And I have determined that they are ever-changing, impermanent, interdependent.
Isn't the reason we're in this forum is to discover the nature of reality? What it is:
Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience.) What it is not: an
independent existing self and independent existing objects.
Marsha
On Oct 9, 2010, at 1:08 AM, 118 wrote:
> I guess it depends on how you define existence. So, what kind of existence
> is left, non-essence, acquired existence, extrinsic existence, relative
> existence, codependent existence? Maybe we are all enabling each other,
> give me a cigarette this is too heavy.
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:36 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> To further expand:
>>
>> Emptiness is the concept that self and all phenomenon are empty of essence,
>> inherent existence, independent existence, intrinsic existence and absolute
>> existence.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2010, at 2:13 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> To expand:
>>>
>>> Emptiness is the concept that self and all phenomenon are empty of
>> essence, inherent existence, and independent existence.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:47 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Emptiness is concept that self and all phenomenon are empty of inherent
>> existence.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> John to Marsha:
>>>>>
>>>>> Meditate. But don't meditate upon nothingness, or you will obtain
>>>>> nothingness. Meditate upon truth and you will know truth. It's really
>> very
>>>>> simple.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andre:
>>>>> John, I'll be honest and say that I have not followed the entire thread
>> but this caught my attention.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prey tell, what is your understanding of 'nothingness' (in Buddhism)
>> and what is 'truth'(in radical empiricism)?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you need to be clear on these two concepts before you burden
>> Marsha with meditating on them.
>>>>> Trying to follow Marsha's frame of mind it sounds like an eternal
>> condemnation into reified and at the
>>>>> same time relativized sq....she'll go nuts!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell me John, is this your true hidden agenda in all this?...get rid of
>> the bitch!
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list