[MD] Quality(DQ/sq)

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

Exactly what do you think there is wrong with annotations 130.131.133.etc,
you know what i mean,
do you see decoherence? is there decoherence? please enlighten me, don't
spare any detail.

I have some comment on the Dan/Marsha interactions, if you like me to post
them , make an effort to work on 130.131.133.etc


demanding , yes , maybe wrong choice of me, it was based on the summa of
earlier postings, the time/content line
showed some demanding connotation.I don't think i have the look and feel
wrong.

You just quoted Anthony on the bridge between east and west.
Greetzz, Adrie

2010/10/13 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>

> Greetings:
>
> I posted these quotes to point to the nature of static quality.
>
>
> Marsha
>
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:38 AM, MarshaV wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > As noted above, Pirsig uses the term ‘Dynamic Quality’ (to denote the
> continually changing flux of immediate reality) and ‘static quality’ (for
> any pattern that appears long enough to be abstracted from this flux).
> ‘Static quality’ refers to anything that can be conceptualised and is a
> synonym for the conditioned in Buddhist philosophy.
> >
> >        (McWatt,Anthony, 'MoQ Textbook)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:32 AM, MarshaV wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Below it state that the fundemental nature of static quality is Dynamic
> Quality:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Moreover, Nagarjuna (1966, p.251) shares Pirsig’s perception that the
> indeterminate (or Dynamic) is the fundamental nature of the conditioned (or
> static):
> >>
> >>    In their ultimate nature things are devoid of conditionedness
> >>    and contingency belongs to this level. This very truth is revealed
> >>    by also saying that all things ultimately enter the indeterminate
> >>    dharma or that within the heart of every conditioned entity (as its
> >>    core, as its true essence, as its very real nature) there is the
> >>    indeterminate dharma. While the one expresses the transcendence
> >>    of the ultimate reality, the other speaks of its immanence. The one
> >>    says that the ultimate reality is not an entity apart and wholly
> >>    removed from the determinate, but is the real nature of the
> >>    determinate itself.
> >>
> >> Nagarjuna and Pirsig also have a similar recognition of two types of
> truth; the ‘static’ conventional truth (sammuti-sacca) and the ‘Dynamic’
> ultimate truth (paramattha-sacca).
> >>
> >>         (Mcwatt,Anthony, 'MoQ Textbook)
> >>
> >> ___
> >>
> >>
> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> Archives:
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser