[MD] Step One
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Thu Oct 14 23:41:01 PDT 2010
On Oct 14, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Dan Glover wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:40 PM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>> John, Dan,
>>
>> It seems there are differing aspects of Quality being discussed.
>>
>> The arguement focusing on which types of Quality are best.
>>
>> While re-examining the root, as Dan suggests, can elimenate alot
>>
>> of false dilemma and reinstate what has greater meaning in ones life,
>>
>> we do so from an intellectual perspective, which is what I believe John
>>
>> is driving at, clarity of meaning in our lives.
>>
>> This not only begins with this re-evaluation of the organic experience, but it
>>
>> guides and drives our social and intellectual values as well.
>>
>> Organic quality would not have the same pleasure of experience if it was
>>
>> not shared socially or reflected apon, for greater understanding intellectually
>>
>> which is the true flower of the totality of experience.
>>
>> Would'nt one say that greater understanding has resulted in better organic
>> Quality?
>>
>> better social Quality?
>>
>> Doesent it make our reasons for holding certain organic and social values
>>
>> better by constantly reflecting and re-defining them?
>>
>> concerning the ego climber, who is it that asserts the ego more?
>>
>> the one examing the self and defining it with their values or the one
>>
>> denying it exists?
>>
>> is not denial of self one of the most insidious acts of selfishness?
>
> Dan:
>
> Hi Ron
>
> I don't know for sure, but I would say that the selfless existence
> doesn't mean denying the self so much as it means realizing the self
> doesn't exist in light of the Buddha's teachings.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Dan"
Dan,
I wonder what you mean by 'realizing in the light of the Buddha's teaching.'
Isn't the Buddha's teachings pointing a finger to the moon, and shouldn't
one go beyond the pointing finger, in other words, realize directly, at least
try? But maybe that's what you are saying.
Marsha
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list