[MD] Step One

[118]

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:09 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:44 AM, 118 wrote:
>
> >  inferred that you were reasoning that Quality was analogous to not this,
> > not that.  Clearly I was mistaken.  You were simply stating that Quality
> can
> > not be described with words.  OK, I get it.  How is it then that you
> discuss
> > it?
>
> Marsha:
> The point is I don't talk about it.  Using intellect to talk about Quality,
> reifies it,
> and it is not this, not that.  I experience it as unpatterned, and
> patterned flow,
> after that nothing fits well.  If you want to talk about Intellectual Level
> patterns,
> or Social Level patterns, or Biological Level patterns, or Inorganic Level
> patterns, I think there is lots to consider and discuss.
>

The point is that while you do not talk about it, you certainly write about
it, unless you are in the wrong forum.  Your description of experience is
shorthand at best  There are at least four words there that need
interpretation (and one of those is not "I", which can also be included).
 So, let's talk about the expression of quality in the subjects you
reference above.  You can consider it not really talking about Quality if
that makes more sense to you.

Mark

>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>