[MD] Step One

[MarshaV]

On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:16 PM, 118 wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:09 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:44 AM, 118 wrote:
>> 
>>> inferred that you were reasoning that Quality was analogous to not this,
>>> not that.  Clearly I was mistaken.  You were simply stating that Quality
>> can
>>> not be described with words.  OK, I get it.  How is it then that you
>> discuss
>>> it?
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> The point is I don't talk about it.  Using intellect to talk about Quality,
>> reifies it,
>> and it is not this, not that.  I experience it as unpatterned, and
>> patterned flow,
>> after that nothing fits well.  If you want to talk about Intellectual Level
>> patterns,
>> or Social Level patterns, or Biological Level patterns, or Inorganic Level
>> patterns, I think there is lots to consider and discuss.
>> 
> 
> The point is that while you do not talk about it, you certainly write about
> it, unless you are in the wrong forum.  Your description of experience is
> shorthand at best  There are at least four words there that need
> interpretation (and one of those is not "I", which can also be included).
> So, let's talk about the expression of quality in the subjects you
> reference above.  You can consider it not really talking about Quality if
> that makes more sense to you.
> 
> Mark

 
 
Hi Mark,

The Dynamic aspect of Quality is unknowable, indivisible, undefinable.  

Static patterns of value are ever-changing, relative, impermanent 
habit that is able to be conceptualized.  

The four levels are interrupted  and defined with slight differences 
dependent on an individuals past static pattern history.  


Marsha  



  
 
 
 
___