[MD] Step One

[118]

Hi Marsha,
Thanks for your help in my search.  I found the following web page on
decontexualization.

http://www.unm.edu/~devalenz/handouts/decontext2.html

Let me know what you think.

Cheers,
Mark

On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:20 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Here is how I interpret, based on how they function,  the Intellectual
> (SOM) Level:
>
>
> The Intellectual Level, the fourth level, is comprised of static patterns
> of value such as theology, mathematics, science and philosophy. The way that
> these patterns function is as reified concepts and the rules for their
> rational analysis and manipulation.  Reification decontextualizes.
>  Intellectual patterns process from a subject/object conceptual framework
> creating false boundaries that give the illusion of independence as a
> “thing” or an “object of analysis.”  The fourth level is a formalized
> subject/object level (SOM), where the paramount demand is for rational,
> objective knowledge, which is free from the taint of any subjectivity like
> emotions, inclinations, fears and compulsions in order to pursue, study and
> research in an unbiased and rational manner.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 23, 2010, at 3:40 AM, MarshaV wrote:
>
> >
> > Correct interrupted to be interpreted.
> >
> >
> > On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:16 PM, 118 wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:09 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:44 AM, 118 wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> inferred that you were reasoning that Quality was analogous to not
> this,
> >>>> not that.  Clearly I was mistaken.  You were simply stating that
> Quality
> >>> can
> >>>> not be described with words.  OK, I get it.  How is it then that you
> >>> discuss
> >>>> it?
> >>>
> >>> Marsha:
> >>> The point is I don't talk about it.  Using intellect to talk about
> Quality,
> >>> reifies it,
> >>> and it is not this, not that.  I experience it as unpatterned, and
> >>> patterned flow,
> >>> after that nothing fits well.  If you want to talk about Intellectual
> Level
> >>> patterns,
> >>> or Social Level patterns, or Biological Level patterns, or Inorganic
> Level
> >>> patterns, I think there is lots to consider and discuss.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The point is that while you do not talk about it, you certainly write
> about
> >> it, unless you are in the wrong forum.  Your description of experience
> is
> >> shorthand at best  There are at least four words there that need
> >> interpretation (and one of those is not "I", which can also be
> included).
> >> So, let's talk about the expression of quality in the subjects you
> >> reference above.  You can consider it not really talking about Quality
> if
> >> that makes more sense to you.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > The Dynamic aspect of Quality is unknowable, indivisible, undefinable.
> >
> > Static patterns of value are ever-changing, relative, impermanent
> > habit that is able to be conceptualized.
> >
> > The four levels are interpreted  and defined with slight differences
> > dependent on an individuals past static pattern history.
> >
> >
> > Marsha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>