[MD] The Dynamics of Value

[118]

Hi Ham,

I would like to provide some feedback on the following paragraph of yours:

[Ham]
Does Dynamic Quality accurately name the Source whose "dynamics" are
unknowable and whose "quality" is realizable only to man?   I think not.
The term "dynamic" suggests a flow or movement like evolution, which applies
to the physical world but not to a transcendent source.  I happen to believe
this uncreated source does not evolve or change, but is immutable. That's
why I have named this metaphysically necessary source Absolute Essence.
It's a non-descriptive appellation, yet one that is relevant and logically
workable for an ontological scheme

[Mark's comment to the above]
Formulaically we can term Absolute Essence as zero, both as a constant and
as a variable.  Everything times zero is zero, for example.  This may or may
not provide further insight, and I can drop immmediately.  Now, while
Absolute Essence does not change, its negation (or expression if you will)
does follow guidelines.  While the possible expression can indeed be
postulated to be infinite, such expression is not quite there (although
close).  Approaching the infinite may mean you are already there...  Is it
possible to provide attributes to Absolute Essence based on its expression
to the subjective sensibility?  If so, can it be the mirror image of that
which is expressed?  This would indeed provide a law of conservation.
 Perhaps Quality can be seen in the same way.  Just a thought (without much
basis).

Cheers,
Mark