[MD] The Dynamics of Value

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

happy hour?

2010/10/26 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com>

> Hi Ham,
>
> I would like to provide some feedback on the following paragraph of yours:
>
> [Ham]
> Does Dynamic Quality accurately name the Source whose "dynamics" are
> unknowable and whose "quality" is realizable only to man?   I think not.
> The term "dynamic" suggests a flow or movement like evolution, which
> applies
> to the physical world but not to a transcendent source.  I happen to
> believe
> this uncreated source does not evolve or change, but is immutable. That's
> why I have named this metaphysically necessary source Absolute Essence.
> It's a non-descriptive appellation, yet one that is relevant and logically
> workable for an ontological scheme
>
> [Mark's comment to the above]
> Formulaically we can term Absolute Essence as zero, both as a constant and
> as a variable.  Everything times zero is zero, for example.  This may or
> may
> not provide further insight, and I can drop immmediately.  Now, while
> Absolute Essence does not change, its negation (or expression if you will)
> does follow guidelines.  While the possible expression can indeed be
> postulated to be infinite, such expression is not quite there (although
> close).  Approaching the infinite may mean you are already there...  Is it
> possible to provide attributes to Absolute Essence based on its expression
> to the subjective sensibility?  If so, can it be the mirror image of that
> which is expressed?  This would indeed provide a law of conservation.
>  Perhaps Quality can be seen in the same way.  Just a thought (without much
> basis).
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser