[MD] Reifying carrots
ADRIE KINTZIGER
parser666 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 18 08:13:00 PDT 2010
But you forgot the rest of the article Marsha
I isolated a part from the article further on as i am very good in Nonlocal
&local reality's.
comment on isolated part
Their treatment of two-slit interference ranks right up there with (but
differs interestingly from) Feynman’s famous “comes in lumps” approach, and
their nontechnical description of Bell’s theorem is one of the best I’ve
seen, and by far the least mathematical.
3 problems
trying to ridicule Feynman is not a very good idea, this is adressed at the
autor.
The Bell theorem.
The theorem is specifically rejected by most of the scientifical
world,because its a limp home formula.
it is under controverse since it was stated.Its rubbish.
MR PIRSIG, specifically rejects the theoreme, in one of his annotations on
LILA'S CHILD,in a earlier stage of history.
He recognised very early that it was crap, and i happen to agree with him
and 99% of science.
PIRSIG rejects it for a reason, this is very easy to find back.
Nb, i was already pointing out in a conversation with Mr Buchanan, some time
ago, that PIRSIG rejects the theoreme
It is still to be found back in the archives, or in the annotations
made upon LILA.
this is only 1 leech to kill, there are more in the article...
sincerely yours , Pontius PILATUS, landlord of judea, the man on the
mountain.
2010/9/18 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>
>
> from American Journal of Physics Review of Quantum Enigma:
>
>
> Take space-time, for example. We organize our perceptions into events, and
> for many purposes it is illuminating to represent those events as points in
> an abstract four-dimensional continuum. This is so useful that most of us
> reify this abstract scheme, believing that we inhabit a world that is such a
> four- (or, for a few of us, ten-) dimensional continuum. The reification of
> abstract time and space goes so far back in human history that it’s easy to
> miss the intellectual sleight of hand. The reification of electric and
> magnetic fields is more recent but also came to be taken for granted, until
> it started to unravel (for some of us) with the arrival of quantum
> electrodynamics. The strongest hints of how we have been fooling ourselves
> emerge when we try to reify quantum states, and thereby run into “the
> measurement problem” and “quantum nonlocality.”
>
>
> http://quantumenigma.com/reviews-our-responses/
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
--
parser
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list