[MD] Reifying carrots

[MarshaV]

Adrie,


I've posted a lot of stuff.  Consider it or don't.  Maybe the book 
will arrive today, and I will have more to post.

By the way, are you a physicist?   And why you exalt what 
you point out?   I don't.   


Marsha 


 
 
 
On Sep 18, 2010, at 11:13 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:

> But you forgot the rest of the article Marsha
> 
> I isolated a part from the article further on as i am very good in Nonlocal
> &local reality's.
> 
> comment on isolated part
> 
> Their treatment of two-slit interference ranks right up there with (but
> differs interestingly from) Feynman’s famous “comes in lumps” approach, and
> their nontechnical description of Bell’s theorem is one of the best I’ve
> seen, and by far the least mathematical.
> 
> 
> 3 problems
> trying to ridicule Feynman is not a very good idea, this is adressed at the
> autor.
> 
> The Bell theorem.
> The theorem is specifically rejected by most of the scientifical
> world,because its a limp home formula.
> it is under controverse since it was stated.Its rubbish.
> 
> MR PIRSIG, specifically rejects the theoreme, in one of his annotations on
> LILA'S CHILD,in a earlier stage of history.
> He recognised very early that it was crap, and i happen to agree with him
> and 99% of science.
> PIRSIG rejects it for a reason, this is very easy to find back.
> 
> 
> Nb, i was already pointing out in a conversation with Mr Buchanan, some time
> ago, that PIRSIG rejects the theoreme
>      It is still to be found back in the archives, or in the annotations
> made upon LILA.
> 
> 
> this is only 1 leech to kill, there are more in the article...
> sincerely yours , Pontius PILATUS, landlord of judea, the man on the
> mountain.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2010/9/18 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
> 
>> 
>> 
>> from American Journal of Physics Review of Quantum Enigma:
>> 
>> 
>> Take space-time, for example. We organize our perceptions into events, and
>> for many purposes it is illuminating to represent those events as points in
>> an abstract four-dimensional continuum. This is so useful that most of us
>> reify this abstract scheme, believing that we inhabit a world that is such a
>> four- (or, for a few of us, ten-) dimensional continuum. The reification of
>> abstract time and space goes so far back in human history that it’s easy to
>> miss the intellectual sleight of hand. The reification of electric and
>> magnetic fields is more recent but also came to be taken for granted, until
>> it started to unravel (for some of us) with the arrival of quantum
>> electrodynamics. The strongest hints of how we have been fooling ourselves
>> emerge when we try to reify quantum states, and thereby run into “the
>> measurement problem” and “quantum nonlocality.”
>> 
>> 
>> http://quantumenigma.com/reviews-our-responses/
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___