[MD] Reifying carrots

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

"Exalt , well , no, i emhased it virtually to show the point that article's
like this contain
falsifications 'an sich' embedded or by association with occult science.

-concider it or don't, well, leads like this are taking other people towards
the article without pointing out
towards the conflicting matters. probably you were not aware of this , and
probably people following the lead
are not , but leaving a part out of its contexts in this way is dangerous
and arose my suspicion.

And of course , no , i am not a physician, i never said i was , i work in a
car factory,with my  hands.
But i'm better than a shitload of them.I was studying all the books you see,
and i think its a good idea
for you to do so, this is encouraging.
Its not a very good idea to jump over the material.

Like the Bell's theoreme,one has to be aware of all this kind of
contamination.

Greetz, the log lady, Burps!





2010/9/18 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>

>
> Adrie,
>
>
> I've posted a lot of stuff.  Consider it or don't.  Maybe the book
> will arrive today, and I will have more to post.
>
> By the way, are you a physicist?   And why you exalt what
> you point out?   I don't.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2010, at 11:13 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:
>
> > But you forgot the rest of the article Marsha
> >
> > I isolated a part from the article further on as i am very good in
> Nonlocal
> > &local reality's.
> >
> > comment on isolated part
> >
> > Their treatment of two-slit interference ranks right up there with (but
> > differs interestingly from) Feynman’s famous “comes in lumps” approach,
> and
> > their nontechnical description of Bell’s theorem is one of the best I’ve
> > seen, and by far the least mathematical.
> >
> >
> > 3 problems
> > trying to ridicule Feynman is not a very good idea, this is adressed at
> the
> > autor.
> >
> > The Bell theorem.
> > The theorem is specifically rejected by most of the scientifical
> > world,because its a limp home formula.
> > it is under controverse since it was stated.Its rubbish.
> >
> > MR PIRSIG, specifically rejects the theoreme, in one of his annotations
> on
> > LILA'S CHILD,in a earlier stage of history.
> > He recognised very early that it was crap, and i happen to agree with him
> > and 99% of science.
> > PIRSIG rejects it for a reason, this is very easy to find back.
> >
> >
> > Nb, i was already pointing out in a conversation with Mr Buchanan, some
> time
> > ago, that PIRSIG rejects the theoreme
> >      It is still to be found back in the archives, or in the annotations
> > made upon LILA.
> >
> >
> > this is only 1 leech to kill, there are more in the article...
> > sincerely yours , Pontius PILATUS, landlord of judea, the man on the
> > mountain.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2010/9/18 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> from American Journal of Physics Review of Quantum Enigma:
> >>
> >>
> >> Take space-time, for example. We organize our perceptions into events,
> and
> >> for many purposes it is illuminating to represent those events as points
> in
> >> an abstract four-dimensional continuum. This is so useful that most of
> us
> >> reify this abstract scheme, believing that we inhabit a world that is
> such a
> >> four- (or, for a few of us, ten-) dimensional continuum. The reification
> of
> >> abstract time and space goes so far back in human history that it’s easy
> to
> >> miss the intellectual sleight of hand. The reification of electric and
> >> magnetic fields is more recent but also came to be taken for granted,
> until
> >> it started to unravel (for some of us) with the arrival of quantum
> >> electrodynamics. The strongest hints of how we have been fooling
> ourselves
> >> emerge when we try to reify quantum states, and thereby run into “the
> >> measurement problem” and “quantum nonlocality.”
> >>
> >>
> >> http://quantumenigma.com/reviews-our-responses/
> >>
> >> ___
> >>
> >>
> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> Archives:
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > parser
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser