[MD] Reifying carrots

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

EMPHASED!!

2010/9/18 ADRIE KINTZIGER <parser666 at gmail.com>

> "Exalt , well , no, i emhased it virtually to show the point that article's
> like this contain
> falsifications 'an sich' embedded or by association with occult science.
>
> -concider it or don't, well, leads like this are taking other people
> towards the article without pointing out
> towards the conflicting matters. probably you were not aware of this , and
> probably people following the lead
> are not , but leaving a part out of its contexts in this way is dangerous
> and arose my suspicion.
>
> And of course , no , i am not a physician, i never said i was , i work in a
> car factory,with my  hands.
> But i'm better than a shitload of them.I was studying all the books you
> see, and i think its a good idea
> for you to do so, this is encouraging.
> Its not a very good idea to jump over the material.
>
> Like the Bell's theoreme,one has to be aware of all this kind of
> contamination.
>
> Greetz, the log lady, Burps!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2010/9/18 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>
>>
>> Adrie,
>>
>>
>> I've posted a lot of stuff.  Consider it or don't.  Maybe the book
>> will arrive today, and I will have more to post.
>>
>> By the way, are you a physicist?   And why you exalt what
>> you point out?   I don't.
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2010, at 11:13 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:
>>
>> > But you forgot the rest of the article Marsha
>> >
>> > I isolated a part from the article further on as i am very good in
>> Nonlocal
>> > &local reality's.
>> >
>> > comment on isolated part
>> >
>> > Their treatment of two-slit interference ranks right up there with (but
>> > differs interestingly from) Feynman’s famous “comes in lumps” approach,
>> and
>> > their nontechnical description of Bell’s theorem is one of the best I’ve
>> > seen, and by far the least mathematical.
>> >
>> >
>> > 3 problems
>> > trying to ridicule Feynman is not a very good idea, this is adressed at
>> the
>> > autor.
>> >
>> > The Bell theorem.
>> > The theorem is specifically rejected by most of the scientifical
>> > world,because its a limp home formula.
>> > it is under controverse since it was stated.Its rubbish.
>> >
>> > MR PIRSIG, specifically rejects the theoreme, in one of his annotations
>> on
>> > LILA'S CHILD,in a earlier stage of history.
>> > He recognised very early that it was crap, and i happen to agree with
>> him
>> > and 99% of science.
>> > PIRSIG rejects it for a reason, this is very easy to find back.
>> >
>> >
>> > Nb, i was already pointing out in a conversation with Mr Buchanan, some
>> time
>> > ago, that PIRSIG rejects the theoreme
>> >      It is still to be found back in the archives, or in the annotations
>> > made upon LILA.
>> >
>> >
>> > this is only 1 leech to kill, there are more in the article...
>> > sincerely yours , Pontius PILATUS, landlord of judea, the man on the
>> > mountain.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2010/9/18 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> from American Journal of Physics Review of Quantum Enigma:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Take space-time, for example. We organize our perceptions into events,
>> and
>> >> for many purposes it is illuminating to represent those events as
>> points in
>> >> an abstract four-dimensional continuum. This is so useful that most of
>> us
>> >> reify this abstract scheme, believing that we inhabit a world that is
>> such a
>> >> four- (or, for a few of us, ten-) dimensional continuum. The
>> reification of
>> >> abstract time and space goes so far back in human history that it’s
>> easy to
>> >> miss the intellectual sleight of hand. The reification of electric and
>> >> magnetic fields is more recent but also came to be taken for granted,
>> until
>> >> it started to unravel (for some of us) with the arrival of quantum
>> >> electrodynamics. The strongest hints of how we have been fooling
>> ourselves
>> >> emerge when we try to reify quantum states, and thereby run into “the
>> >> measurement problem” and “quantum nonlocality.”
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://quantumenigma.com/reviews-our-responses/
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> >> Archives:
>> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > parser
>> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> > Archives:
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> parser
>



-- 
parser