[MD] I am that

[MarshaV]

On Sep 19, 2010, at 3:59 PM, plattholden at gmail.com wrote:

> On 19 Sep 2010 at 13:15, MarshaV wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sep 19, 2010, at 12:40 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:
> 
>> [Marsha to Platt]
>> Certainly dynamic individuals like Mr. Pirsig are a separate category.  I
>> agree, I agree, I agree.
>> 
>> [Arlo]
>> Human individuals are a composition of the four levels of value patterns. They
>> are not a "separate category", whatever that means. 
> 
> Marsha:
> I was speaking using conventional language.   I didn't mean to confuse you.   
> 
> Platt
> Human individuals are composites of the four levels of  static value patterns 
> plus ability to respond to DQ. The static intellectual level doesn't have that 
> ability. That's why individuals are a separate category. They are the shakers 
> and movers of the evolution of life.   
 

Marsha:
I seem to be a fictitious self and an experiencing individual.  The fictitious self 
is my memory, the composite of the four levels of static patterns of value, and the  
experiencing individual is my responding to DQ.  I can endlessly deny my 
fictitious self: not this, not that, but I cannot seem to deny that I am not other than 
this and that.  A separate category?  Sure, that's easy:  nuts...   

imho.  
 
  
 
 

 
___