[MD] I am that

[plattholden at gmail.com]

Hi Marsha,

You and all human individuals are a separate category from animals, able to 
respond to the creative force of DQ. Otherwise, we are helpless victims of the 
collective Giant who "doesn't mind losing a few bodies to protect his greater 
interests." (Lila, 17)  When we reject the concept of the sacredness of human 
life, genocide becomes acceptable.

Platt    


On 20 Sep 2010 at 3:23, MarshaV wrote:


On Sep 19, 2010, at 3:59 PM, plattholden at gmail.com wrote:

> On 19 Sep 2010 at 13:15, MarshaV wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sep 19, 2010, at 12:40 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:
> 
>> [Marsha to Platt]
>> Certainly dynamic individuals like Mr. Pirsig are a separate category.  I
>> agree, I agree, I agree.
>> 
>> [Arlo]
>> Human individuals are a composition of the four levels of value patterns. 
They
>> are not a "separate category", whatever that means. 
> 
> Marsha:
> I was speaking using conventional language.   I didn't mean to confuse you.   
> 
> Platt
> Human individuals are composites of the four levels of  static value patterns 
> plus ability to respond to DQ. The static intellectual level doesn't have that 
> ability. That's why individuals are a separate category. They are the shakers 
> and movers of the evolution of life.   
 

Marsha:
I seem to be a fictitious self and an experiencing individual.  The fictitious 
self 
is my memory, the composite of the four levels of static patterns of value, and 
the  
experiencing individual is my responding to DQ.  I can endlessly deny my 
fictitious self: not this, not that, but I cannot seem to deny that I am not 
other than 
this and that.  A separate category?  Sure, that's easy:  nuts...   

imho.  
 
  
 
 

 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html