[MD] The MOQ differemce

[MarshaV]

Hi Platt,

On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:45 PM, plattholden at gmail.com wrote:

> 
> 
>> Platt:
>> "Patterns" bother me. They presume subjects looking at ordered objects. Even 
>> "experience" suggests the S/O division. Instead I would like to see "valuing" 
>> substituted for "experience," "consciousness," "awareness" and "perception." -- 
>> valuing Dynamically (creatively) or statically (predictably). Then the world of 
>> things become static values and the act of painting becomes Dynamic.value 
>> creation, motivated by betterness. 
> 
> Marsha:
> 'Subjects looking' is a patterned way of thinking.  No such thing; only static 
> patterns of value moving through a field of DQ.  The value is held together 
> by repetition through time and across individuals.  At least that 's how I 
> understand.  Lila is an accumulation of ever-changing patterns intersecting 
> with DQ. 
> 
> Platt:
> I don't think "patterns" add anything. In fact, they obscure the value 
> universe. Why not just say, "No such thing, only static values moving through a 
> field of DQ." And, "Lila is an accumulation of ever-changing static values 
> intersecting with DQ."  Does inserting "patterns" add anything? 


Marsha:

The word 'pattern' represents repetition which gives strength and duration to 
static value, and the word adds something ascetic. The phrase 'static pattern 
of value' is poetic.    
 
 
 
___