[MD] [Bulk] Re: MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)

[Mary]

Hi Dan,

I don't know who you are.  I used to think I did.  What are you objecting
to?  Are you always this rude to people?  I find your comments unhelpful and
nasty without reason.  Why don't you go Fxxx yourself?

Thanks,
Mary

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Dan Glover
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 12:06 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] [Bulk] Re: MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)

Hello everyone

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Mary <marysonthego at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Arlo,
>
> Pretty late for me on a 'school' night, but your excellent post 
> deserves a response - quickly.
>
> [Mary now]
> Of course it is stuck in subjectivism.  Absolutely!  Remember, I am 
> one who thinks the Intellectual Level is SOM all the way, for all of 
> us, all the time.  I happen to think that anyone unwilling to admit 
> that is kidding themselves - and I see you, DMB, Andre, and Dan kidding
yourselves daily.

Hi Mary

You'll have to add Robert Pirsig's name to that list. BTW, I thought we were
done with this SOM as intellect bullshit. Did you not get Horse's memo?

Dan
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html