[MD] [Bulk] Re: MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)

Dan Glover daneglover at gmail.com
Sat Apr 2 09:29:12 PDT 2011


Hello everyone

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Mary <marysonthego at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I don't know who you are.  I used to think I did.

Dan:
Why on earth would you think you know who I am? Because you've read a
few of my posts? Please. I don't even know who I am.

Mary:
What are you objecting
> to?

Dan:

That should be clear, but since it isn't I will repeat:

Mary:
I am
> one who thinks the Intellectual Level is SOM all the way, for all of
> us, all the time.  I happen to think that anyone unwilling to admit
> that is kidding themselves - and I see you, DMB, Andre, and Dan kidding
yourselves daily.

Dan:

Why am I kidding myself daily? Because you think SOM is intellect?
That just isn't right and we've been over and over and over it. The
notion has been debunked many times by many people, including Robert
Pirsig. And at the start of the year, Horse sent a memo stating that
any discussion of SOM as intellect would no longer be tolerated.
Again, I repeat: Did you not get it?

Mary:
Are you always this rude to people?

Dan:
I have to admit, I do tend to suffer fools poorly. But no, normally I
am a pretty nice guy. Just don't be stupid and we'll get along fine.

Mary:
I find your comments unhelpful and
> nasty without reason.  Why don't you go Fxxx yourself?

Dan:
Well, it is good you are so polite and respectful, as Arlo says.

Thank you,

Dan



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list