[MD] freewill

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:39 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:29 PM, Dan Glover wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan,
>>> You seem to me to be implying that since values are consistant in their choices
>>> they
>>> are incapable of altering those choices. That static patterns can not change and
>>> we
>>> can not effect change in them.
>>
>> Dan:
>>
>> What I think the MOQ says is that static quality patterns cannot
>> change by themselves. They change in response to Dynamic Quality. I
>> believe RMP brings this up in the discussion about the Zuni brujo.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Dan
>
>
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I'm curious how you interpret static patterns of value.  If you are sitting on your office
> chair in the morning, and reading a book while sitting in a lounge chair in the evening,
> is there a difference in the static pattern of value representing chair, or is the static
> pattern of value some Platonic idea, or something else?
>
> Thank you for all your explanation.

Hi Marsha

At the moment of intellectualization, I catagorize the chair according
to social patterns that I have built up over my experience with
chairs. So to answer your question, yes.

Perhaps you could explain how this pertains to the discussion we are having?

Thank you,

Dan