[MD] freewill

[MarshaV]

On Apr 9, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Dan Glover wrote:

> Hello everyone
> 
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:39 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:29 PM, Dan Glover wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello everyone
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dan,
>>>> You seem to me to be implying that since values are consistant in their choices
>>>> they
>>>> are incapable of altering those choices. That static patterns can not change and
>>>> we
>>>> can not effect change in them.
>>> 
>>> Dan:
>>> 
>>> What I think the MOQ says is that static quality patterns cannot
>>> change by themselves. They change in response to Dynamic Quality. I
>>> believe RMP brings this up in the discussion about the Zuni brujo.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Dan,
>> 
>> I'm curious how you interpret static patterns of value.  If you are sitting on your office
>> chair in the morning, and reading a book while sitting in a lounge chair in the evening,
>> is there a difference in the static pattern of value representing chair, or is the static
>> pattern of value some Platonic idea, or something else?
>> 
>> Thank you for all your explanation.
> 
> Hi Marsha
> 
> At the moment of intellectualization, I catagorize the chair according
> to social patterns that I have built up over my experience with
> chairs. So to answer your question, yes.
> 
> Perhaps you could explain how this pertains to the discussion we are having?
> 
> Thank you,


Marsha,

It is my point that static value is relative and ever-changing, but changes within 
a stable, predictable pattern, rather than static value as fixed and discrete.  


Thank you.


Marsha 











 
___