[MD] freewill

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:18 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Dan Glover wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:39 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:29 PM, Dan Glover wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everyone
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan,
>>>>> You seem to me to be implying that since values are consistant in their choices
>>>>> they
>>>>> are incapable of altering those choices. That static patterns can not change and
>>>>> we
>>>>> can not effect change in them.
>>>>
>>>> Dan:
>>>>
>>>> What I think the MOQ says is that static quality patterns cannot
>>>> change by themselves. They change in response to Dynamic Quality. I
>>>> believe RMP brings this up in the discussion about the Zuni brujo.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> I'm curious how you interpret static patterns of value.  If you are sitting on your office
>>> chair in the morning, and reading a book while sitting in a lounge chair in the evening,
>>> is there a difference in the static pattern of value representing chair, or is the static
>>> pattern of value some Platonic idea, or something else?
>>>
>>> Thank you for all your explanation.
>>
>> Dan:
>>
>> At the moment of intellectualization, I catagorize the chair according
>> to social patterns that I have built up over my experience with
>> chairs. So to answer your question, yes.
>>
>> Perhaps you could explain how this pertains to the discussion we are having?
>>
>
>
> Marsha:
>
> It is my point that static value is relative and ever-changing, but changes within
> a stable, predictable pattern, rather than static value as fixed and discrete.

Dan:
Static quality patterns are determinate. Dynamic Quality is not. What
do you think? Does that work for you?

Thank you,

Dan