[MD] freewill

[MarshaV]

Jan-Anders,

Thanks for the suggestion.   


Marsha


On Apr 12, 2011, at 4:36 AM, Jan-Anders wrote:

> Dear Marsha
> 
> I am answering, therefore I am. I am for real.
> 
> I am free to use my free will and choose something *between* adding, deformulating or revaluating the message. Real Dynamic Quality work which makes it either better or worse, half depending on the quality of the reader. It is a process, an event. You're part of the event while reading this. You're as important as I am in this. I just can't do it without your assistance.
> 
> Metaphysics is mirroring the event to understand HOW the event is working and to be able to do a better job.
> 
> This forums intention is to discuss and understand MOQ in that perspective.
> 
> Horse is doing the practical mirroring of the MOQ. Dmb is very clear and concise too.
> 
> I dont think there is much need for another mirroring activity or the "Metaphysics of the Metaphysics" here but as I can see that many of your submissions is often about "mirroring the mirror/questioning the question" I thought you might be interested in reading the works of Boris Vian. He's quite fun sometimes.
> 
> Wish I was the best..
> 
> Jan-Anders
> 
> moq_discuss-request at lists.moqtalk.org skrev 2011-04-12 09.52:
>> Jan,
>> 
>> Words on a page, or spoken may be very important and wise, but more so
>> if accompanied by insight.  -  But you haven't said anything and left the entire
>> suggestion for interpretation and projection.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 



 
___