[MD] [Bulk] Re: MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)

[John Carl]

Ok Marsha, I'm on your side with what needs to be replaced, but I'm not a
big fan of what you want to replace it with!

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:03 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
>
> Hi John,
>
> Now it's Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.  And why the idea of  an "expanded"
> intellectual level makes me "laugh".  A total flip to a nondual
> understanding
> is required; nondual when all the intellectual patterns are killed off long
> enough to really, really see.
>
>

I think we need duality.  Duality is good, but not a duality of good and
evil.  We need a duality of head and heart - classic and romantic - science
and art, together at last.  Duality is good.  It takes two to tango.





> Luckily the daffodils will be open today, or for sure tomorrow.
>
>
>


I've been driving down to Marysville everyday, swooping down through the
green rolling hills and the cows and the flowers.  Finally got my license
all done, and I'm headed to N. Dakota this week.  Speaking of the prairie...