[MD] [Bulk] Re: MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)

[MarshaV]

On Apr 19, 2011, at 2:56 PM, John Carl wrote:

> Ok Marsha, I'm on your side with what needs to be replaced, but I'm not a
> big fan of what you want to replace it with!
> 
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:03 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi John,
>> 
>> Now it's Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.  And why the idea of  an "expanded"
>> intellectual level makes me "laugh".  A total flip to a nondual
>> understanding
>> is required; nondual when all the intellectual patterns are killed off long
>> enough to really, really see.
>> 
>> 
> 
> I think we need duality.  Duality is good, but not a duality of good and
> evil.  We need a duality of head and heart - classic and romantic - science
> and art, together at last.  Duality is good.  It takes two to tango.

We have duality; you've considered what that is all about.  But what 
about non-duality, can you even imagine.  This is where I think about 
Joe's presentation of 'joy.'    




>> Luckily the daffodils will be open today, or for sure tomorrow.
>> 
> 
> I've been driving down to Marysville everyday, swooping down through the
> green rolling hills and the cows and the flowers.  Finally got my license
> all done, and I'm headed to N. Dakota this week.  Speaking of the prairie...

I've often thought about renting an RV and being a traveling gypsy for a 
a year or two.  There is so much of the country I'd like to experience.     




Marsha 


 
___