[MD] Bitterness over Betterness
X Acto
xacto at rocketmail.com
Tue Apr 26 16:45:11 PDT 2011
Marsha:
I think the same approach can be taken towards freedom. First, there's the
ineffable, Ultimate freedom of following DQ. I believe this is what Dan is
pointing to when he presents RMP's quote "To the extent that one's behavior is
controlled by static patterns of quality is without choice. But to the extent
that one follows Dynamic Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior is
free." Second, there is the static, ego-based freedom that thinks itself
chooses between this or that. - Personally, I think that an event has multiple
interconnected causes and conditions which in turn have multiple interconnected
causes and conditions, &etc., &etc., &etc. It may be correct to think that an
individual participates within the 'multiple causes and conditions', but to say
WE CHOOSE is totally self-centered; it's illusion and not very useful.
Ron:
well thats a well reasoned conclusion, but I think that the illusion "we choose"
is more powerfull and better than
the illusion that we have no choice.
there are all sorts of things one can choose to change if one sets their mind to
it
that they never knew were possible before.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list