[MD] Evil in the Church of Reason

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Dan,

IMHO the metaphysical division of DQ/SQ defined, undefined, leaves one in a
quandary.  When I realize the quandary as the description of knowing I
realize some things are indefinable.  How can I know the indefinable.  Wrong
conclusions do not force the attention to the indefinable, rather to the
process which is a roundabout way of bringing metaphysics in by the back
door instead of starting with indefinable as part of reality.

Joe


On 8/11/11 8:55 PM, "Dan Glover" <daneglover at gmail.com> wrote:

> Wrong conclusions are the sins of knowledge. They are touch stones
> that tell us when we make a low quality assumption about reality. If
> we ignore them, there is a weak link in our system of organization. We
> learn by making mistakes, not by being correct.