[MD] Evil in the Church of Reason

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> IMHO the metaphysical division of DQ/SQ defined, undefined, leaves one in a
> quandary.  When I realize the quandary as the description of knowing I
> realize some things are indefinable.  How can I know the indefinable.  Wrong
> conclusions do not force the attention to the indefinable, rather to the
> process which is a roundabout way of bringing metaphysics in by the back
> door instead of starting with indefinable as part of reality.

Dan:

We define the undefined all the time. We could say the process of
awareness is that process of defining. When we discover we've failed
to define some thing properly (a wrong conclusion) we're momentarily
at a loss. That sense of loss is the beginning response to Dynamic
Quality that leads to greater knowledge.

In "echoing" John you are echoing a wrong conclusion. Perhaps it is an
opportunity for you both to learn from it... or not.

Thank you,

Dan