[MD] Evil in the Church of Reason

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Dan,

DQ is a metaphysical principle, indefinable, and there is no metaphysical
reality for DQ in definition e.g., emotions.  The failure is the attitude in
logical discourse that everything must be defined like in mathematics, Imho.

Joe    


On 8/12/11 11:39 AM, "Dan Glover" <daneglover at gmail.com> wrote:

> We define the undefined all the time. We could say the process of
> awareness is that process of defining. When we discover we've failed
> to define some thing properly (a wrong conclusion) we're momentarily
> at a loss. That sense of loss is the beginning response to Dynamic
> Quality that leads to greater knowledge.
> 
> In "echoing" John you are echoing a wrong conclusion. Perhaps it is an
> opportunity for you both to learn from it... or not.
> 
> Thank you,