[MD] self: agent of action & thinker of thoughts
Joseph Maurer
jhmau at comcast.net
Wed Aug 17 12:45:29 PDT 2011
Hi MarshaV and all,
In a DQ/SQ metaphysics the definition for common words changes. I do not
know what language will look like when MOQ is fully accepted. For example
the word "Essence" cannot mean Objective reality. In my own mind I use my
first name "Joe", as DQ in me which is indefinable yet stays the same like
"essence". For "person" I substitute the word "Maurer" for the description
of a continuous base of my identify SQ which can be modified by DQ. Clumsy!
Joe
On 8/17/11 11:02 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
<snip>
> Marsha:
> RMP has called an autonomous self is an illusion, In Lila he states: "This
> self-appointed little editor of reality is just an impossible fiction that
> collapses the moment one examines it." And in Lila's Child he states that the
> MoQ "denies any existence of a ³self² that is independent of inorganic,
> biological, social or intellectual patterns. There is no ³self² that contains
> these patterns." Statically, conventionally, and for that matter
> linguistically, from any of those point-of-view, it is illusory. Call it
> remnants of the subject-object point-of-view if you like.
>
> At least that is how I understand it. I'm not sure how far apart are our
> views.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list