[MD] Modern Psychology: Good, Bad, or Indifferent to MoQ

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Mark and All,

MOQ suggests that DQ/SQ describes reality.  DQ is indefinable.   I accept
metaphysics that the reality DQ is indefinable.  When I try to piece
together metaphysics I go back to what words are a trigger for each level?

I accept that DQ is indefinable.  When I compare DQ to stated reality I
examine Emotions.  Emotions are indefinable.  However, thoughts, sensations,
words, used in communication are definable.  How are emotions different?  I
am content that MOQ, DQ(as emotions)/SQ, accepts that some levels in reality
are indefinable.  

I think of Heroes, and I accept the possibility that higher emotional and
higher intellectual values may also be indefinable.

The reality of Metaphysics formats language.  An appeal to the language
Physics which follows a strict logic of mathematics, may reveal the hiding
place for Metaphysics, the language of evolution.  What is logic?

Joe

On 12/16/11 2:53 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Reality IS indefinable since words are only a small part of reality.
> The rest has no words associated with it, and therefore cannot be
> defined.  In the same way, our reality is only a small part of
> Reality.  (No, we do not create Reality, Reality creates with us.  We
> are not so powerful.  For indeed, how would it be that we create
> Reality?  What tools do we use for such construction?  We are the
> tools).  So, reality being indefinable is just "common sense" to me
> anyway.  Just because reality is undefined does not mean that we
> cannot participate in it and influence it.  For that is what we do.
> 
> Hope this clears up what I am presenting (as an opinion).  I got a bit
> carried away...