[MD] Modern Psychology: Good, Bad, or Indifferent to MoQ

[118]

Hi Joe,
I am on board with you calling DQ emotions.  It is as good an analogy as any I suppose.  Logic can get very emotional too.

As I see it you are differentiating between something understandable, and something which is not.  I suppose we are left with that which we do not care about or something outside our present reality.  DQ can transform into sq, when something becomes understandable (or definable).  If i go to Greece, the magazines in Athens are all DQ.  Once I learn Greek, they become sq.  What was once DQ becomes sq.

Do I have this right?

Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark

On Dec 17, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi Mark and All,
> 
> MOQ suggests that DQ/SQ describes reality.  DQ is indefinable.   I accept
> metaphysics that the reality DQ is indefinable.  When I try to piece
> together metaphysics I go back to what words are a trigger for each level?
> 
> I accept that DQ is indefinable.  When I compare DQ to stated reality I
> examine Emotions.  Emotions are indefinable.  However, thoughts, sensations,
> words, used in communication are definable.  How are emotions different?  I
> am content that MOQ, DQ(as emotions)/SQ, accepts that some levels in reality
> are indefinable.  
> 
> I think of Heroes, and I accept the possibility that higher emotional and
> higher intellectual values may also be indefinable.
> 
> The reality of Metaphysics formats language.  An appeal to the language
> Physics which follows a strict logic of mathematics, may reveal the hiding
> place for Metaphysics, the language of evolution.  What is logic?
> 
> Joe
> 
> On 12/16/11 2:53 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Reality IS indefinable since words are only a small part of reality.
>> The rest has no words associated with it, and therefore cannot be
>> defined.  In the same way, our reality is only a small part of
>> Reality.  (No, we do not create Reality, Reality creates with us.  We
>> are not so powerful.  For indeed, how would it be that we create
>> Reality?  What tools do we use for such construction?  We are the
>> tools).  So, reality being indefinable is just "common sense" to me
>> anyway.  Just because reality is undefined does not mean that we
>> cannot participate in it and influence it.  For that is what we do.
>> 
>> Hope this clears up what I am presenting (as an opinion).  I got a bit
>> carried away...
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html