[MD] X = no-self

[Ian Glendinning]

To Marsha, spot on I'd say.

To Arlo, Do you not see "self" as an issue "behind things" here ?
I ask because your points .... clearly Marsha finds a handle
pragmatically useful like the rest of us, clearly objectifying the
(named) individual is a pitfall the MoQ intends us to avoid, and
clearly it takes two to "reflect" .... don't address that particular
point.

Ian.


On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Xxxx s a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled within a field of DQ.  If you haven't figured that out yet, you do not have an iota of MoQ understanding.  -  So before moving on to a subject as emotionally charged as politics, maybe there should be a review of what the 'self' is within the MoQ.   -  To those who would call me angel or asshole, know that that name-calling is a reflection of your own patterns.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>