[MD] X = no-self
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Tue Jan 4 08:01:10 PST 2011
On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Dan Glover wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:50 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> What do you think the 'self' is within the MoQ? You might check your copy of the MoQ Textbook.
>
> Hi Marsha
>
> What is self?
Marsha:
That would depend on who you asked? A philosopher, a psychologist, a theologian,
a Native-American, a lawyer, a child might all have different answers.
> I'm curious.
>
> Why do I need a textbook to tell me what I've known my whole life?
Marsha:
Obviously you don't, but there is a section that addresses the 'self.'
> Why do I need a metaphysics?
Marsha:
Why did you edit Lila's Child? Why should anyone read it?
> Isn't self already clear to you too? Why so much effort spent endlessly defining
> that which we already know?
Marsha:
These seem to be your questions and don't make sense to me.
>
> Dan
>
> PS An asshole is the twin of an angel.
Marsha:
Is this absolutely true? How do you know?
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list