[MD] X = no-self

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Tue Jan 4 08:01:10 PST 2011


On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Dan Glover wrote:

> Hello everyone
> 
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:50 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> What do you think the 'self' is within the MoQ?  You might check your copy of the MoQ Textbook.
> 
> Hi Marsha
> 
> What is self?

Marsha:
That would depend on who you asked?  A philosopher, a psychologist, a theologian, 
a Native-American, a lawyer, a child might all have different answers.  


> I'm curious.
> 
> Why do I need a textbook to tell me what I've known my whole life?

Marsha:
Obviously you don't, but there is a section that addresses the 'self.'   


> Why do I need a metaphysics?

Marsha:
Why did you edit Lila's Child?   Why should anyone read it? 


> Isn't self already clear to you too? Why so much effort spent endlessly defining
> that which we already know?

Marsha:
These seem to be your questions and don't make sense to me.   


> 
> Dan
> 
> PS An asshole is the twin of an angel.


Marsha:
Is this absolutely true?  How do you know? 


 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list