[MD] X = no-self
Dan Glover
daneglover at gmail.com
Tue Jan 4 09:14:21 PST 2011
Hello everyone
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Ian Glendinning
<ian.glendinning at gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, Marsha, Dan, Horse,
>
> Dan, yep, I saw your tactic.
Hi Ian
I had no tactic, per se. My questions were legitimate, just not
answerable in the traditional sense. Thus they made no sense, as
Marsha observed.
The "why metaphysics" question was not directed towards the discussion
in general but rather towards Marsha's definition of self. The MOQ
definition of self is laid out in LILA and other subsequent writings
so there is no need to rehash it here, so far as I can see.
But still, if a person needs to ask "why metaphysics" in a discussion
group dedicated to the Metaphysics of Quality, what are they doing
here in the first place? I thought that went without saying: We're all
degenerates. Period.
Dan
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list