[MD] X = no-self

[MarshaV]

Hi Tim,

On Jan 5, 2011, at 3:04 AM, rapsncows at fastmail.fm wrote:

> Marsha,
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha:  
>> I am a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic,
>> biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled
>> within a field of DQ.  
>> 
>> 
> 
> [Tim]
> Marsha, I like the update to 'entangled within a...", but I think that
> 'field' might bring in associations that you don't intend (EM field...).

Marsha:
John is responsible for the 'entanglement' update.  I don't know EM field.    
I've used the term 'field' before but more in relation to quantum field.  It 
seemed to fit well with the word 'entanglement.'  Field as an ontological
framework.  


> Perhaps you might prefer to consider something along the lines of
> 'forum' even, or 'arena', or just 'entangled within DQ'.

Marsha:
Maybe 'entangled within DQ' would be better, but I like the connection 
with QM.  I see the MoQ and quantum physics confronting the same 
issues.  


> Question 1: are you / can you be, aware of anything that is not included
> in this 'collection'?

Marsha:
Aware?  My answer is no.  There may very well be all sorts of unrecognized 
patterns included in the collection but outside awareness means outside 
awareness.  That would be an excellent reason, though  to cultivate a more 
subtle awareness.   


> Well, I have just decided that I will leave it at this for now.  Perhaps
> I have another question or two to follow.
> 
> Tim
> -- 





 
___